Compare AirScape to other Whole House Fans
We make the best whole house fans in the business. We’re sure of it.
And we’ll show you exactly why, one product comparison at a time.

AirScape design mandate
Designing and bringing a product to market always involves compromise. Product designers need to set priorities, which in turn determine feature set and engineering. So in any evaluation, it is important to understand the goals of the product design process. Here’s the AirScape design mandate:
- optimal airflow performance
- whisper-quiet overnight operation
- industry-leading energy-efficiency
- an automatic, insulated air-tight seal between attic and living space
- innovative engineering with industrial build quality
- overall real-world usability and livability
- manufacturability and serviceability
So where does AirScape compromise?
The short answer to that question is—at the risk of sounding glib—mostly, we compromise on our own margins. Our business strategy is to become the market leader by offering the best engineered products and the best value. So we over-engineer; our component and manufacturing costs are way above industry norms. But because we sell direct to consumers online, our distribution and marketing costs are very low, which helps us recover the profits we need to grow. AirScape products are not cheap, but we believe we are far and away the value leaders in our category. And we have thousands of happy customers who would agree with us. We’ve engineered it that way.
Competitive product comparisons
| AirScape 1.0 WHF vs Tamarack HV1000 |
| AirScape 1.7 WHF vs Tamarack HV1600 |
| AirScape 3.0 WHF vs Quiet Cool QC-1500 (coming soon) |
| AirScape 3.0 WHF vs R.E. Williams SuperFan (coming soon) |
In making comparisons, it is not out intention to trash-talk our competitors or over-hype our equipment. But we do want customers to understand the engineering differences and what that can mean in real-world use. We’ve done our best to be fair—all data presented is as published by the manufacturer or observed in our technical evaluation. If you have any direct experience with equipment profiled here that contradicts what we are presenting, we urge you contact us.

